Local TV??

Ok, so living within the second largest TV market in the nation (Los Angeles) has both its advantages and disadvantages. Indeed, the number and variety of local channels is difficult to match. And for the most part, the Los Angeles news outfits all have very high production standards (though, high production standards does not always translate into high news value).

However, in a market so diverse, so large (geographically speaking) and increasingly more and more dynamic, what is it going to take to obtain bonafide local TV coverage? Specifically, what has to happen before Inland Southern California (population 3+ million) actually gets its own local, major-network television station?

In the United States, there are over 200 DMAs (Designated Market Area) that define the geographic boundaries for over-the-air television stations. Most of these boundaries -- established during the infancy of television and radio in the mid 1900s -- follow already existing county lines, which themselves are the primary boundaries used for Census tracts.

On the east coast, such markets -- and counties -- tend to be smaller geographical entities. However, on the west coast, where many counties are as large as some eastern states, the geographical service area can be extremely large. No where else is this disparity more apparent than within the Los Angeles DMA.

With each passing year as the suburban areas around Los Angeles proper continue to expand, more and more of the local TV audience is simply being underserved by the LA-based TV stations. Moreover, many of the suburban cities within Greater Los Angeles have far larger population bases than a number of cities across the U.S. that have their own DMA (and 1 or more local TV stations). Furthermore, some cities within the LA DMA are as far away from Los Angeles proper as Philadelphia is from Baltimore. And yet, the LA-based stations are still entrusted to service these areas with local programming. To no one's surprise, they don't (unless of course, there's some over-the-top, bizarre news story).

To make matters worse, most LA-based stations continue to remain ignorant, apathetic -- even egocentric -- towards the changing dynamics shaping the Greater Los Angeles market.

For example, a few years ago, an ABC affiliate based in Palm Springs was looking to move its transmitter to a higher elevation within the nearby San Jacinto Mountains (the 10,000-foot-high mountain range essentially separates the LA and Palm Springs television DMAs). However, such a move -- which could have provided Inland Southern California with the potential for better localized TV programming -- would have meant signal-bleed into the eastern portions of the Los Angeles DMA. Thus, the network-owned Los Angeles ABC station voiced opposition to the potential market infringement and the transmitter move was never made (admittedly, the environmental impact of such a move played a factor as well).

Which made us wonder. If the LA stations are concerned about signal-bleed from a transmitter that's 100 miles away, then how in the world do the Baltimore and Washington D.C. television DMAs coexist? After all, the two cities lie within 38 miles of each other, and yet, each have separate and distinct DMAs. Or, what about the Boston and Providence DMAs? Raleigh-Durham and Greensboro-WinstonSalem? Or even Buffalo and Rochester and Rochester and Syracuse DMAs respectively? Some of these markets are as tight -- or tighter -- in proximity than Riverside is to Los Angeles. And yet, Inland Southern California is apparently unable to have a local, major network TV station -- why?

Obviously the separate Baltimore and Washington D.C. DMAs have more to do with historical precedence than anything else. Which is fine. But, does that mean that high-growth regions -- particularly those out west, many of which have "come of age" just within the past 25 years -- need forever remain within old, static and outdated DMAs?

Of course not.

Thus, since much of the nation's growth the past 25+ years has in fact taken place out west in the years following the establishment of the DMAs, it brings to reason that a reexamination of these market boundaries is indeed appropriate.

PS...the few UHF channels originally assigned to Inland Southern California (e.g., channels 18, 46, 52 and 62) have each been essentially hijacked by Los Angeles-based special interest programming entities (mostly foreign language). With few exceptions, their studios, offices and administration all have Los Angeles County locations. And, of course, none of these stations offer any substantial amount of local "Inland" programming. To be fair, there is one surviving locally-based channel (KVCR-TV 24). But as a PBS station, it simply does not have the resources -- nor the clout -- to battle the dominant LA networks.

Related

• Riverside Press-Enterprise - Battle for TV coverage
• Designated Market Area rankings
• 02 - KCBS-TV
• 04 - KNBC-TV
• 05 - KTLA-TV (WB)
• 07 - KABC-TV
• 09 - KCAL-TV
• 11 - KTTV-TV (Fox)
• 13 - KCOP-TV (UPN)
• 18 - KSCI-TV (San Bernardino/Los Angeles)
• 24 - KVCR-TV (PBS)
• 28 - KCET-TV (PBS)
• 34 - KMEX-TV (Univision)
• 46 - KHSC-TV (Ontario - Home Shopping Channel)
• 52 - KVEA-TV (Corona/Los Angeles - Telemundo)
• 56 - KDOC-TV (Anaheim/Los Angeles)
• 62 - KRCA-TV (Riverside/Los Angeles)